Image by rawpixel.com on Freepik
Definitions and Interpretations
Employee relations can be simply defined as the relationship that exists between employers and employees (CIPD, 2022). The rise of individual workplace rights has led to individualisation of the employment relationship so to speak (CIPD, 2022).
Employee relations essentially deals with the management of the employment relationship and the psychological contract, which include a mix of collective and individual approaches (Armstrong and Taylor, 1977). Armstrong recognises that at present, there is a tendency to move away from collectivism (e.g. collective agreements, collective bargaining etc.) and move towards individualistic ways to address the employment relationship and associated concerns, instead.
Two main hierarchies can be identified in the employment relationship structure (Crail, 2022). They are;
1. Vertical Employee Relations - this includes the relationships between employees and superiors
2. Horizontal Employee Relations - these are same level employee relationships
Employment relations aim to foster a positive relationship between employers and employees, resulting in higher employee retention, happiness, and workplace productivity (Crail, 2022). Ensuring good practices in both these hierarchies will be instrumental in fostering a conducive working environment and contribute to the success of the organisation.
The Psychological Contract is a term used when discussing employee relations. It is used to describe the expectations, beliefs and obligations of an employee pertaining to their job role. While the contract of employment supplies the building blocks of the employment relationship, the psychological contract brings in the 'human side' of the same relationship (CIPD, 2022). A psychological contract may be said to span across aspects such as job security, fair treatment in the workplace, pay and benefits, training and development, career prospects, involvement in CSR projects etc (CIPD, 2022). It is right to assume that having due regard for this, as much as the contract of employment is important, given that its quality can influence the way an organisation's employees behave day to day. It is key to performance and engagement at work.
It is also significant in the evolving world of work, as a dynamic concept that can be applied to understand it and the employment relationships within it, as and when it changes.
Status Quo
Research shows employers have a positive outlook regarding the employment relations climate within their organisations, with over 85% categorising relations between managers and employees as 'very good' and 'good,' and a small percentage of 3% recording 'poor' or 'very poor' (CIPD, 2022).
While the latter 3% is not cause for alarm, it certainly rings a bell for these organisations to rethink their approach to human resource management entirely. This is because employees no longer remain in work environments where they feel undervalued, stressed, unheard, and as if they were a replaceable cog in the wheel.
It may be suggested that the pandemic pushed organisations to place employee relations on a higher pedestal. Think about it. Companies had to implement new health and safety measures, adapt new working models such as remote and hybrid working, invest in new technologies, and recalibrate company policies pertaining to leave etc.
New and emerging dialogues in the rights space such as paternity and parental leave (E.g. Sri Lanka), and menstruation leave (E.g. Spain) are providing a fresh perspective on employee relations.
These demonstrate how employee relations are tested during these changing times, and the role of employers in light of them.
Views on Employee Relations
There are two distinct opinions on this matter - the unitary and pluralist viewpoints (Armstrong and Taylor, 1977).
- Unitary viewpoint - expressed by Walton as the principle of mutuality in 1985. This is the belief that employees and management have the same concerns and that collaboration between employees and managers is essential for tackling these shared concerns (Armstrong and Taylor, 1977).
- Pluralist viewpoint - does not see an overlap between the concerns of management and employees and believes that the unitary view is naive, unrealistic and is not in the employee's best interests (Armstrong and Taylor, 1977).
Based on my reading, I subscribe to the pluralist viewpoint.
This is because as much as the employer expects to pay the employee for the work done and the employee waits to receive such payment, employers and employees have interests that are intrinsic to each. These mutually exclusive interests or concerns result in conflicts of interest often, which necessitates a contract of employment containing grievance escalating mechanisms and dispute resolution clauses. It would not be so, if employee relations were unitary. As such, they need to be handled with care, having due regard to all interests at play, communicated policies and strategies.
Armstrong and Taylor (1977) further list down four approaches to employee relations.
They are as follows;
1 Adversarial: This approach encapsulates an organisation which decides its plan of action, and expects the employees to conform to it. Employees are able to exercise their power by way of refusal to abide by the plan of action set by the organisation.
2 Traditional: Encompasses an everyday working relationship where the management proposes a course of action and the employees react to it through their elected representatives. Where they are in disagreement, they may quit.
3 Partnership: Envisages a situation where the employees work together with the organisation in drafting and execution of policies. However, the management does not forego its right to manage.
4 Power sharing: Envisages a setup where employees have the best of both worlds. Here they are involved in the day-to-day and are also strategic decision-makers.
- (Armstrong and Taylor (1977))
How are employee relations relevant at present?
The recent conversations surrounding the topic of work-life balance in an exceedingly digital world, show the detrimental impact that an 'always on' work culture has on employee engagement (Bye, 2021). It has even resulted in numerous cases of 'quiet quitting' which I will deal with in a separate article on this blog. Employee relations as a concept plays a key role in providing flexibility which in turn will contribute to better productivity levels and less absenteeism in the workplace. It could also contribute to retaining talent in the long run, which is vital to an organisation's survival.
Having comprehensive employee relations policies in place could aid dispute resolution of workplace conflicts with ease, without seeking expensive legal advice or taking legal action which ties up money, time, energy, output and the reputation of the organisation for a long period of time.
HR professionals who take the existence of the psychological contract into account, can support employees by directing resources where they are stretched (Bye, 2021). As such, it could assist in pre-empting employee needs, and having them in place before the lack of such a thing escalates into a problem. This would also create a conducive work space for both parties, increased motivation, increased loyalty, improved trust and confidence and better overall engagement.
I conclude by saying that, having the concept of employee relations at the heart of organisational decisions will provide such an organisation with a competitive edge over all others who do not.
Reference List
Armstrong, M. and Taylor, S. (1977) Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. 13th ed. United Kingdom.
CIPD (2022) Employee Relations: an introduction. [online] Available from https://www.cipd.co.uk/knowledge/fundamentals/relations/employees/factsheet#gref [Accessed 18 March 2023]
Crail, C. (2022) What Is Employee Relations? [online] www.forbes.com. Available from https://www.forbes.com/advisor/business/what-is-employee-relations/ [Accessed 18 March 2023]
CIPD (2022) Psychological Contract. [online] CIPD. Available from https://www.cipd.co.uk/knowledge/fundamentals/relations/employees/psychological-factsheet#gref [Access 18 March 2023]
Bye, S. (2021) The role of employee relations in human resources. [online] University of Lincoln. Available from https://online.lincoln.ac.uk/the-role-of-employee-relations-in-human-resources/ [Accessed 19 March 2023]
While these theories are fascinating, I personally think that something that is often wholly overlooked by employers, and ignored or suppressed by employees, is that not everyone is looking for a "career" - many are looking for a job.
ReplyDeleteThe harsh reality is that for many people, they need a job to make the ends meet, but their "life" is entirely different to their job. This in no way makes them less suitable for employment - in fact, for many tasks, you may be better off with someone who wants a job rather than someone who wants a "career".
Furthermore, when it comes to people who want a job, which, while I have no evidence to back it up, I suspect is quite a lot and probably even a majority - their only interest is to get paid to do what they are responsible for, sure with some credit for a job well-done thrown in, if warranted.
Acknowledging this, I think will help companies stop this nonsense of appreciations and "employee of the month" kinds of things and all this forced excess of team building nonsense. If someone does well, reward them with money or time off. I mean, it must really be a vain person who wants to be rewarded with their face plastered on a wall.
I think acknowledging this and accepting, on both sides, that not everyone wants a career, and not every role needs a career person is a crucial need of the hour.
This will help the ones who want a career to succeed, while also helping those who just want to do their jobs, so that they can fund their lives, and which they would not want work to be any part of, to be happy too. It could, in my view, create a real win-win situation.
Now of course, I fully expect to be lambasted for this insensitive comment, but I really think people must be reasonable and realistic. I mean, is it really possible to be driven and passionate about data entry?
Surely, the passionate and inspired have their place. They will rise to lead organizations and do what they love. But why not just let the other simple people, do their job, and go home, leaving their work at work! I think this will solve a lot of the friction between employers and employees.
Keen to hear your thoughts.
Thank you for your thought provoking comment. While I agree with your perspective, I do not see why both of these (your view and mine) cannot exist at the same time in light of the concept of employee relations, as it has been explored here today. If we are to consider this aspect of the psychological contract which HR personnel are asked to give regard to, it would essentially capture both these kinds of employees, that is, the ones who are just here to do their job, earn their pay and go back to their families, and those who are ambitious and expect much more from the workplace. The idea behind taking cognisance of the employee relations is that you take account of the unique needs of the employees, whatever they may be. I do not see a conflict of the concepts as such. I also think that the world of work is evolving quite a bit as it is constantly being informed by other socio-cultural dialogues. In light of this, it will be difficult for organisations to succeed if they do not take account of these changes in some way.
ReplyDeleteNo, no. I am in no way saying they can't exist together, nor was I trying to refute the points made here. It's merely that it would be better if everyone was a little more realistic instead of much of the pretense we see on both sides. And yes, agree re the changing paradigms.
ReplyDeleteI believe the lines are quite blurry now as to what is realistic and what is not.
DeleteYou well explained the employee relation, In my view, Nowadays employees expect to work in an environment where they can express their opinion freely without management interruption.
ReplyDeleteEmployees expect to mention not only their work and responsibility but also their rights as well in the written contract.
I cannot agree with psychological agreement as it will not resolve issues arrive at work places and there will not be evidence or proof 'how the employee should be treated'
Thank you for your feedback, Azeem. Good observation on the employment contracts, and yes, as someone involved in drafting contracts for employees often, I can say that it is a good practice to express in detail - the job role in line with duties and responsibilities of both parties.
DeleteI believe the confusion with the concept of the psychological contract that scholars in this field talk about, purely comes about due to it being an abstract concept. It does feel far removed from that which we can see and read on paper.
It is my opinion that taking cognisance of the existence of the psychological contract and how it may be evolving alongside the socio-economic and cultural changes that are taking place in the world of work, will assist organisations when drafting legal contracts and policies, and the implementation of diverse, equitable and inclusive company policies.
According to my knowledge and what I have read there is no statutory provision for parental and paternity leave still in n Sri Lanka. Am I correct on this Thanuki? I think this is an important part in terms of the employee rights. What are you thoughts on this?
ReplyDeleteGood observation, Lasni. There are no laws that exclusively address parental and paternity leave in employment in Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka only provides for maternity leave in its labour laws. However, there is nothing to stop companies from implementing their own policies, in this way, as long as they can continue to implement it in the long run. In fact, I believe that this would create a positive ripple effect, encouraging more and more organisations to consider accommodating such new and upcoming trends within their company policies. It would boost employee confidence and loyalty in the organisation as well.
DeleteInsightful article.
ReplyDeleteI agree with the statement that employers and employees have intrinsic interests that can result in conflicts of interest, and that these conflicts can be addressed through well-designed employment contracts that contain grievance mechanisms and dispute resolution clauses.
To address these differing concerns, employment contracts for employees at present often include provisions for grievance mechanisms and dispute resolution, such as arbitration or mediation, which can help to resolve conflicts in a fair and efficient manner. By providing a clear process for resolving conflicts, these contracts can help to ensure that both employers and employees are able to protect their interests while working towards a common goal."
Thank you for engaging with my article, Nadeer. Excellent observation on the Alternative Dispute Resolution mechanisms such as arbitration and mediation which are gaining more popularity in the employment dispute space. These are seen as cost-effective and timely means of seeking redress, as opposed to long-drawn out legal battles.
DeleteI got know your article content and your article skill both are good. Thank you for sharing
ReplyDeleteThank you for your feedback, Nilufa.
DeleteVery broad article. Well done! I am finding it difficult to understand the psychological contract part. Other than that, the write up is amazing!
ReplyDeleteThank you for your honest feedback. I agree, the discussion around the psychological contract can get confusing. Let me help you understand better with a video that I watched while reading for this article. It is concise and quite clear. Please follow this link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjRAfKIn-dk&t=10s . The video is by Oxford Review. I hope this helps you to get some clarity on the topic.
DeleteGrate article, personnel, maintaining a positive and productive environment can help everyone accomplish their goals and stay motivated as employees may interact with one another and their managers on a daily basis. The consistency of policy, performance, and professionalism requirements can be achieved through good employee relations. Your team's problems might be easier to spot and address if you have a solid understanding of potential employee relations circumstances. In this article I can see very well.
ReplyDeleteThank you for engaging with my article and providing your insights, Asanka. Certainly, as you have rightly pointed out, good employee relations and the collaborative aspect it brings to the workplace, helps to identify potential issues and come up with speedy effective solutions to them.
DeleteGood details about employee relationship, it's been briefly mentioned. Vertical and horizontal both relationship should be healthy in a organization journey. In my opinion the most two aspects that need to have healthy relationship is empathy and concern.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your kind feedback. Yes, I have not gone into the vertical and horizontal relationships in detail in this article, as my focus in this broad topic was elsewhere. The brief introduction was used to provide the foundation for the rest of the article. That being said, empathy and concern for others are indeed integral qualities that must be instilled in employee relationships at the outset in order to create a conducive work environment. Thank you for adding that valuable insight here.
DeleteYou did an excellent job of highlighting the current state of employee relations and the challenges faced by HR professionals in today's rapidly changing work environment.
ReplyDeleteIt would be helpful to include more information on how technology is shaping employee relations, including the use of employee engagement platforms and tools for measuring employee satisfaction and feedback. Hope to see some of those in your future blogs!
Thank you for your kind feedback and comments, Prasadi. I will certainly try to address the areas you have mentioned in my future articles.
DeleteHi Thanuki, Given the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on employee relations, what do you believe has been the most notable change in the way organizations engage with their employees? How has your organization responded to these changes, and what approaches have proven to be most effective?
ReplyDeleteThank you for the timely question, Praveen. In terms of notable changes, like I've mentioned above, I believe organisations are moving towards solutions with newer technology and remote and hybrid working models. There is also the aspect of employee wellbeing being taken more seriously now, than before the pandemic.
DeleteMy situation is quite unique, as I am a legal apprentice and do not work for an organisation, I am not in a position to comment on specific changes and approaches that you have asked about. However, having a better sense of flexibility, having in place proper feedback and employee engagement mechanisms, having proper company policies pertaining to employee privacy and safety, practicing transparency and accountability, learning, development and staying up-to-date on compliance related matters associated with these changes could prove to be effective ways to respond to them.
Well written article , Thanuki! I completely agree with you on the importance of good employee relations in fostering a healthy working environment and contributing to the success of an organization. In fact, research has shown that good employee relations can improve employee job satisfaction, commitment, and retention .(Hayase, 2018).
ReplyDeleteBased on your experience, how can organizations effectively balance the interests of both employers and employees in the employee relations process? Are there any specific strategies or practices that have been found to be particularly effective in achieving this balance?
Thank you for your kind feedback, Thahani.
DeleteDiving into your questions, which inquire on organisations effectively balancing interests of both employers and employees, and specific strategies which have proven effective in this regard, I would first respond by saying that it is absolutely necessary for organisations to find the right balance between the rights and interests of these two separate groups. Secondly, as discussed in this article, it is important for organisations to understand that the interests of these two groups are not entirely shared, but rather more mutually exclusive, and to give them due regard. In light of this, it is important to ensure that there are consultations with employees, collaboration, effective communication at all times, transparency, accountability and feedback mechanisms in place to begin with.
Genz culture is changing how some of these traditional relationships are maintained. Organisations need to start taking a more progressive approach, also taking mental wellbeing into consideration.
ReplyDeleteGreat observation on the GenZs, and one that I have not explored in this article. I am certainly up for discussing more on this, if you are. In terms of mental wellbeing, which I have touched upon, I agree that it must become a priority for organisations as soon as possible, if it has not already.
DeleteThank you for your feedback and insights, Amila. I will try to incorporate a few practical examples as an extension to this article when time permits. Thank you for the suggestion as well.
ReplyDelete